Understanding Overstays Under South African Immigration Law
- Razeen Khan

- Dec 2
- 2 min read
Overstaying a visa in South Africa is governed by the Immigration Act 13 of 2002. A common misconception is that travellers must pay a “fee” or “fine” at the airport in order to be released by Border Management officials and allowed to return to their home country. The Act does not provide for any such payment. There is no legal “overstay fee”, and no amount of money can be demanded under the legislation as a condition for departure.
What the law actually provides is an administrative consequence: a traveller who has overstayed may be declared undesirable when they leave South Africa. This undesirable status results in a temporary ban from returning, depending on the length of the overstay. The purpose of the law is to regulate re-entry, not to prevent the person from departing. Travellers must be allowed to leave, and there is no statutory payment required in order to do so.
Airlines, however, sometimes impose their own charges on passengers with immigration issues. These are commercial charges linked to airline risk and internal policies, not legal fees authorised by the Immigration Act. They should not be confused with any form of government fine. Paying an airline’s charge does not remove an overstay nor prevent an undesirable declaration, and it is not a requirement imposed by South African law to permit departure.
A traveller facing an overstay at the airport should be processed for departure, declared undesirable if applicable, and then permitted to board their flight home. If a declaration is made, it affects future entry, not the ability to leave the country. Any future return to South Africa would require either waiting out the ban or submitting a formal uplift request to Home Affairs. In either context, the ban must be formally uplifted.
Understanding this distinction is crucial, especially in high-pressure immigration or emigration situations. Early legal advice can help prevent unnecessary panic, ensure that travellers are not misled by incorrect information or those 'taking chances,' and make sure the process unfolds as the law intended.


Comments